"Drafts"
Welcome, %habrauser%!
Once again want to raise the issue button "In drafts".
This is a horrible functionality. I understand that completely remove the functionality of such a button is impossible. All wrong, someone writes an interesting article, someone not, however it is well known that articles of a certain content cause a lot of emotions and they often result in the cons article. The reason the cons can serve not only the content of the article as a whole, but separate, recklessly abandoned phrase or just a krivost of a syllable (remember the recent translation of the "9 UUU", which has been twice published and removed by the author).
How, then, to escape a "poor" author from a wholesale drop karma? And whether or not it actually save? My answer is clearly necessary. BUT the articles or questions, once posted, should not be hidden! And that is why, the button "drafts", should be changed. In my opinion, the output of one button "block the vote", then the author will be able to stop its decline as in the case of concealment of the article, but the information will remain available to the community.
Well, where without it! A side effect is, probably, the most.
In the case of Habra jamb ideas that Habr lives on the basis of self-regulation and if possible quite with impunity publish a lot of crap very quickly, the resource will become a dustbin and is in dire need of moderation. And so that's not an option. So it is necessary to impose some additional conditions. You can think of? Well, for example, to disable the button "lock voting" to a certain level of votes (or number).
Alas, this is not the only problem that came to my sophisticated mind. After the author has blocked the vote, he can edit the article and to write there everything that I am and not what you can't be with
do. People run to kill directly in karma, but in the first place so can do not all (have to have something for the soul that would merge the karma of another), and secondly, to vent discontent can be only once in life, a second chance Habr do not provide. Therefore, as a solution to this problem, you can unlock the ability to vote for the article after some editing by the author respectively the threshold allowing the lock counter is reset to zero.
Button "drafts" of course it is necessary to leave until the paper has not been published that I could keep her at the time of writing.
Actually, that's all I wanted to convey to the public and the administration of the resource. I have no doubt that this article (if you can call it that) will be evaluated differently. And, of course, I will press "To drafts" to save himself in case of need.
Thank you for your attention.
Article based on information from habrahabr.ru
the Essence of the cry of the soul
Once again want to raise the issue button "In drafts".
This is a horrible functionality. I understand that completely remove the functionality of such a button is impossible. All wrong, someone writes an interesting article, someone not, however it is well known that articles of a certain content cause a lot of emotions and they often result in the cons article. The reason the cons can serve not only the content of the article as a whole, but separate, recklessly abandoned phrase or just a krivost of a syllable (remember the recent translation of the "9 UUU", which has been twice published and removed by the author).
How, then, to escape a "poor" author from a wholesale drop karma? And whether or not it actually save? My answer is clearly necessary. BUT the articles or questions, once posted, should not be hidden! And that is why, the button "drafts", should be changed. In my opinion, the output of one button "block the vote", then the author will be able to stop its decline as in the case of concealment of the article, but the information will remain available to the community.
Side effect
Well, where without it! A side effect is, probably, the most.
In the case of Habra jamb ideas that Habr lives on the basis of self-regulation and if possible quite with impunity publish a lot of crap very quickly, the resource will become a dustbin and is in dire need of moderation. And so that's not an option. So it is necessary to impose some additional conditions. You can think of? Well, for example, to disable the button "lock voting" to a certain level of votes (or number).
Alas, this is not the only problem that came to my sophisticated mind. After the author has blocked the vote, he can edit the article and to write there everything that I am and not what you can't be with
do. People run to kill directly in karma, but in the first place so can do not all (have to have something for the soul that would merge the karma of another), and secondly, to vent discontent can be only once in life, a second chance Habr do not provide. Therefore, as a solution to this problem, you can unlock the ability to vote for the article after some editing by the author respectively the threshold allowing the lock counter is reset to zero.
conclusion
Button "drafts" of course it is necessary to leave until the paper has not been published that I could keep her at the time of writing.
Actually, that's all I wanted to convey to the public and the administration of the resource. I have no doubt that this article (if you can call it that) will be evaluated differently. And, of course, I will press "To drafts" to save himself in case of need.
Thank you for your attention.
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий